AI Engineering · Level 2 — Engineer

AI Engineer

From Prototype to Production-Grade AI

Engineer reliable AI systems with deeper model understanding, advanced RAG, adaptation, agents, evaluation, security, observability and cost.

40Days
8Weekly checkpoints
2Mini projects
1Market-oriented capstone
Tools & concepts you’ll work with
Python PyTorch Hugging Face ChromaDB GitHub Copilot LoRA / PEFT MCP tool ecosystems Observability
Curriculum

Your 40-day plan

Every day has one clear learning outcome, and every week ends with a checkpoint you must be able to explain and demonstrate.

Week1
Understand AI Engineering Stack
Days 1–5

Goal: Build the engineering foundation: Python for AI systems, tensors/autograd, training engineering and tokenization.

  1. Day01

    Map an AI application into data, model, inference, evaluation and production components.

  2. Day02

    Write Python suitable for AI workflows, including data handling, functions, modules and practical pipeline code.

  3. Day03

    Use tensors and autograd to understand and implement basic differentiable computations.

  4. Day04

    Explain a training loop and identify the roles of data, batches, loss, optimizer and checkpoints.

  5. Day05

    Inspect tokenization and explain how text becomes model-ready token IDs.

Checkpoint: Map an AI system into data, model, training/inference and evaluation; use Python, inspect tensors/autograd and explain tokenization.
Week2
Understand Transformers
Days 6–10

Goal: Understand the core Transformer mechanisms and the engineering implications of inference.

  1. Day06

    Explain learned representations and inspect embedding behavior for semantic similarity.

  2. Day07

    Implement or trace self-attention and explain how token relationships are computed.

  3. Day08

    Explain why multiple attention heads can capture different relationships in the same sequence.

  4. Day09

    Trace the major components of a Transformer block and explain their purpose.

  5. Day10

    Explain inference bottlenecks and the practical trade-offs affecting latency and throughput.

Checkpoint: Trace embeddings, self-attention, multi-head attention and Transformer blocks; reason about inference bottlenecks.
Week3
Understand LLMs
Days 11–15

Goal: Engineer LLM applications using deliberate model choice, structured generation and scalable prompting.

  1. Day11

    Select models using task quality, latency, context, reliability and cost requirements.

  2. Day12

    Design reliable structured outputs and validate model responses before application use.

  3. Day13

    Create reusable prompt patterns, templates and versioned prompt workflows.

  4. Day14

    Define an engineering problem, architecture, success criteria and test plan for Mini Project 1.

  5. Day15

    Build the first engineering-grade version of Mini Project 1 with structured outputs and tests.

Checkpoint: Select models by requirements, validate structured outputs, build reusable prompts and test an engineering-grade LLM app.
Week4
Engineer Advanced RAG
Days 16–20

Goal: Build an advanced RAG pipeline from ingestion through retrieval and reranking.

  1. Day16

    Improve the project using test results, failure analysis and engineering changes.

  2. Day17

    Design the end-to-end RAG architecture and identify its quality and latency bottlenecks.

  3. Day18

    Build a document ingestion pipeline that cleans, chunks and prepares content for retrieval.

  4. Day19

    Implement retrieval and tune it against representative queries.

  5. Day20

    Add reranking and explain how it can improve the relevance of retrieved context.

Checkpoint: Design/implement advanced RAG with ingestion, retrieval and reranking; diagnose quality and latency bottlenecks.
Week5
Make RAG Reliable
Days 21–25 Mini Project 1

Goal: Improve retrieval reliability and decide when to use prompting, RAG or fine-tuning.

  1. Day21

    Transform difficult user queries into retrieval-friendly queries and evaluate the improvement.

  2. Day22

    Measure retrieval and answer quality with a repeatable evaluation approach.

  3. Day23

    Identify and mitigate common RAG failure modes such as missing context, noisy context and unsupported answers.

  4. Day24

    Choose an adaptation approach based on knowledge freshness, behavior, data and engineering constraints.

  5. Day25

    Explain the fine-tuning workflow and identify when it is appropriate.

Checkpoint: Transform queries, measure retrieval/answer quality, diagnose failures and justify prompting vs RAG vs fine-tuning.
Mini Project 1 is introduced this week — you choose one idea, then build it over two independent studio days. See project details
Week6
Adapt Models
Days 26–30

Goal: Understand practical model adaptation and build increasingly capable tool-using agents.

  1. Day26

    Explain parameter-efficient fine-tuning and build or trace a simple LoRA/PEFT workflow.

  2. Day27

    Evaluate whether model adaptation actually improved the target behavior.

  3. Day28

    Engineer a tool-using agent with clear tool schemas and controlled execution.

  4. Day29

    Design memory for an agent and distinguish short-term state from longer-lived knowledge.

  5. Day30

    Explain how standardized tool interfaces can connect agents to broader tool ecosystems.

Checkpoint: Apply LoRA/PEFT concepts, evaluate adaptation, engineer tools/agents, design memory and explain tool ecosystems.
Week7
Engineer Reliable Agents
Days 31–35 Mini Project 2

Goal: Make agents measurable and safer while extending them to multimodal and voice workflows.

  1. Day31

    Create tests for agent trajectories, tool use, task success and failure cases.

  2. Day32

    Engineer a workflow that combines text with image or other modalities.

  3. Day33

    Build or trace a voice workflow and reason about latency, turn-taking and failure handling.

  4. Day34

    Identify prompt injection, data exposure and tool misuse risks and apply engineering controls.

  5. Day35

    Instrument an AI workflow so failures and quality regressions can be investigated.

Checkpoint: Evaluate agent trajectories, engineer multimodal/voice workflows, identify security risks and instrument systems.
Mini Project 2 is introduced this week — you choose one idea, then build it over two independent studio days. See project details
Week8
Take AI to Production
Days 36–40 Capstone

Goal: Move from an engineered prototype toward a production AI system with explicit architecture, cost and reliability decisions.

  1. Day36

    Estimate major AI costs and identify changes that can reduce latency or spend.

  2. Day37

    Design a production architecture with APIs, model services, data, retrieval, evaluation and operational controls.

  3. Day38

    Defend the capstone architecture and justify key technical trade-offs.

  4. Day39

    Implement and integrate the capstone system against its defined success criteria.

  5. Day40

    Review failures and decisions, document the system and present the engineering outcome.

Checkpoint: Quantify cost/latency, design production architecture, defend capstone trade-offs, implement and document the result.
Capstone — a dedicated production and planning day, then you build independently and return for review after one week. See project details
How every session works

The studio pattern behind all 40 days

  1. story
  2. problem framing
  3. concept
  4. AI use
  5. live build
  6. analyze
  7. experiment
  8. streamline
  9. viva + recap

Our AI philosophy

Students use AI to accelerate implementation, but must understand important generated code/configuration, inspect outputs, test changes, identify failures and justify decisions.

Projects

Build, ship and defend your work

Two mini projects and a market-oriented capstone. You use AI to build faster — and you explain the important generated code and decisions.

How Mini Project 1 works

Students choose one idea. The project is introduced with 30 extra minutes on the introduction day. After introduction, use two independent studio work days for implementation; these are student build days rather than new lecture sessions.

Minimum requirements

  • Solve a clear user problem.
  • Use the concepts covered before the project introduction.
  • Use AI for at least one research/design/build/debug/review task.
  • Keep an AI context/prompt log.
  • Demonstrate a working POC.
  • Explain the important generated code and one thing that was changed after analysis.

Submission checklist

  • Target user + clear problem
  • Architecture diagram
  • Working core flow
  • 5 test cases
  • 2 failure/limitation cases
  • README explaining technique choice
  • Git repository + short demo
  • Student can explain important code/design decisions

Pick one idea · 30 options

  1. Evaluated College AI Assistant
  2. Reliable Customer Support Copilot
  3. Structured Resume Analyzer
  4. Contract Clause Extraction Assistant
  5. Product Review Classifier with Evaluation
  6. AI Email Triage Service
  7. Document Classification API
  8. Support Routing API with Metrics
  9. Meeting Notes Structured Extractor
  10. Invoice Extraction Service
  11. Complaint Categorization Service
  12. Sales Lead Qualification Service
  13. Interview Feedback Structurer
  14. Policy Compliance Checker
  15. FAQ Answering Service with Test Set
  16. AI Content Quality Checker
  17. Customer Feedback Insight Service
  18. Ticket Priority Prediction API
  19. AI Form Processing Service
  20. Summarization API with Regression Tests
  21. AI Recommendation Prototype
  22. Search Ranking Experiment
  23. Semantic Duplicate Detector
  24. Question Difficulty Classifier
  25. AI Data Cleaning Assistant
  26. Model Comparison Dashboard
  27. Prompt Regression Harness
  28. LLM Cost Tracking Prototype
  29. AI Response Validator
  30. Small/Large Model Router
Fees

Invest in Level 2 - AI Engineer

One program, two ways to enrol. Students with a valid college ID save ₹10,000 on the same 40-day program.

Save ₹10,000Student fee₹35,000 + GSTWith a valid college ID · same program
Regular fee₹45,000 + GST40 days · 2 mini projects · capstone
Self-Assessment · 10 questions

How ready are you for Level 2 - AI Engineer?

Answer 10 quick questions and get an instant score, a topic-by-topic breakdown and a recommended level.

AI Engineering path

Where this level fits

Your mentor

Learn From Someone Who Builds AI at Scale

Your mentor has spent 15+ years architecting enterprise infrastructure and now builds agentic AI for autonomous operations, so your guidance is grounded in real engineering decisions, trade-offs and production experience.

Sekhar

  • Co-founder, Zenzo AI (zenzolabs.com)
  • Infrastructure Architect
  • Automation Leader
  • AI Builder

15+ years of experience architecting scalable, secure and automated infrastructure platforms. Specialized in virtualization, cloud automation and agentic AI to drive autonomous operations at enterprise scale.

15+Years experience
6+Global enterprises
1000+VMs managed at scale
40%+Manual effort reduced
Expertise
Cloud & VirtualizationAutomation & OrchestrationAgentic AI & LLMsCompliance & ReliabilityObservability & Analytics

Ready for Level 2?
AI Engineer