Mini Project 2 is introduced this week — you choose one idea, then build it over two independent studio days. See project details
Week8
Take AI to Production
Days 36–40 Capstone
Goal: Move from an engineered prototype toward a production AI system with explicit architecture, cost and reliability decisions.
Day36
Estimate major AI costs and identify changes that can reduce latency or spend.
Day37
Design a production architecture with APIs, model services, data, retrieval, evaluation and operational controls.
Day38
Defend the capstone architecture and justify key technical trade-offs.
Day39
Implement and integrate the capstone system against its defined success criteria.
Day40
Review failures and decisions, document the system and present the engineering outcome.
Checkpoint: Quantify cost/latency, design production architecture, defend capstone trade-offs, implement and document the result.
Capstone — a dedicated production and planning day, then you build independently and return for review after one week. See project details
How every session works
The studio pattern behind all 40 days
story
problem framing
concept
AI use
live build
analyze
experiment
streamline
viva + recap
Our AI philosophy
Students use AI to accelerate implementation, but must understand important generated code/configuration, inspect outputs, test changes, identify failures and justify decisions.
Projects
Build, ship and defend your work
Two mini projects and a market-oriented capstone. You use AI to build faster — and you explain the important generated code and decisions.
How Mini Project 1 works
Students choose one idea. The project is introduced with 30 extra minutes on the introduction day. After introduction, use two independent studio work days for implementation; these are student build days rather than new lecture sessions.
Minimum requirements
Solve a clear user problem.
Use the concepts covered before the project introduction.
Use AI for at least one research/design/build/debug/review task.
Keep an AI context/prompt log.
Demonstrate a working POC.
Explain the important generated code and one thing that was changed after analysis.
Submission checklist
Target user + clear problem
Architecture diagram
Working core flow
5 test cases
2 failure/limitation cases
README explaining technique choice
Git repository + short demo
Student can explain important code/design decisions
Pick one idea · 30 options
Evaluated College AI Assistant
Reliable Customer Support Copilot
Structured Resume Analyzer
Contract Clause Extraction Assistant
Product Review Classifier with Evaluation
AI Email Triage Service
Document Classification API
Support Routing API with Metrics
Meeting Notes Structured Extractor
Invoice Extraction Service
Complaint Categorization Service
Sales Lead Qualification Service
Interview Feedback Structurer
Policy Compliance Checker
FAQ Answering Service with Test Set
AI Content Quality Checker
Customer Feedback Insight Service
Ticket Priority Prediction API
AI Form Processing Service
Summarization API with Regression Tests
AI Recommendation Prototype
Search Ranking Experiment
Semantic Duplicate Detector
Question Difficulty Classifier
AI Data Cleaning Assistant
Model Comparison Dashboard
Prompt Regression Harness
LLM Cost Tracking Prototype
AI Response Validator
Small/Large Model Router
How Mini Project 2 works
Students choose one idea. The project is introduced with 30 extra minutes on the introduction day. After introduction, use two independent studio work days for implementation; these are student build days rather than new lecture sessions.
Minimum requirements
Solve a clear user problem.
Use the concepts covered before the project introduction.
Use AI for at least one research/design/build/debug/review task.
Keep an AI context/prompt log.
Demonstrate a working POC.
Explain the important generated code and one thing that was changed after analysis.
Submission checklist
Target user + clear problem
Architecture diagram
Working core flow
5 test cases
2 failure/limitation cases
README explaining technique choice
Git repository + short demo
Student can explain important code/design decisions
Pick one idea · 30 options
High-Quality College Knowledge RAG
Product Manual RAG
HR Policy RAG
Legal Document RAG
Sales Enablement RAG
Technical Documentation RAG
Customer Support RAG
Financial Education RAG
University Regulations RAG
Insurance Policy RAG
Real Estate RAG
Procurement RAG
Startup Research RAG
Competitive Intelligence RAG
E-commerce Catalog RAG
Training Materials RAG
Compliance RAG
NGO Operations RAG
Tourism RAG
Agriculture Knowledge RAG
Restaurant Operations RAG
Franchise Operations RAG
IT Helpdesk RAG
Developer Documentation RAG
Hybrid Retrieval RAG
Reranked RAG
Query-Rewrite RAG
RAG Evaluation Dashboard
Tool-Using Research Agent
Governed Support Agent
How the capstone works
The capstone gets a dedicated production/planning day. Students then develop it independently and return for review after one week.
Minimum requirements
Solves a real problem.
Has a clear target user and business value.
Can be deployed as a live product.
Has enough functionality to demonstrate the level's skills.
Uses AI meaningfully, not as decoration.
Has a path to monetization, client delivery or portfolio value.
Review after one week
Students present a complete journey from identifying the problem
Product: target customer, problem, value proposition, workflow and adoption/payment rationale.
Your mentor has spent 15+ years architecting enterprise infrastructure and now builds agentic AI for autonomous operations, so your guidance is grounded in real engineering decisions, trade-offs and production experience.
15+ years of experience architecting scalable, secure and automated infrastructure platforms. Specialized in virtualization, cloud automation and agentic AI to drive autonomous operations at enterprise scale.